- Sabine's Newsletter
- Posts
- A Magnetic Mystery, Vanishing Clouds, the Cost of Reason, and CMB Trouble
A Magnetic Mystery, Vanishing Clouds, the Cost of Reason, and CMB Trouble
This week’s science bits from SWTG

Scientists Stumped by Link Between Magnetic Field and Oxygen Levels

I don’t find this terribly convincing, but who am I to judge? VGADM stands for Virtual Geomagnetic Axial Dipole Moment. Figure: Kuang et al, Sci Adv 11, 24 (2025).
In a study that just appeared in Science Advances, geoscientists report a mysterious correlation between the strength of Earth’s magnetic field and atmospheric oxygen levels in the past 540 million years. They speculate that tectonic dynamics might both have influenced Earth’s magnetic field as well as the abundance of oxygen-binding organisms or minerals, but really they have no idea what’s going on. Maybe it’s worth pausing work on your theory of everything for a moment to take this on. Paper here, more here.
This week’s episode of Science News is about a problem with the cosmic microwave background (CMB). In the Big Bang Theory, the CMB — microwave-range radiation that floats through the entire universe at a steady 2.7 Kelvin — is evidence that a hot explosion of plasma kicked off the creation of the universe. But according to a new paper, the microwave radiation came from early galaxies instead. Does this mean that the big bang theory is wrong? Let’s take a look. This week’s video also comes with a quiz, which you can take here.
Speaking of quizzes, you can now create and share your own quizzes on QuizWithIt for free! Each quiz has a unique URL, can be embedded into websites or newsletter, and be shared on social media. Happy quizzing!
More Evidence That Earth Is Losing Clouds

Image: NASA Worldview
Clouds are the Achilles’ heel of climate models. Their formation and behavior is beyond the models’ capability to compute, and yet their response to warming temperatures is a major feedback mechanism. A new analysis of satellite data from NASA just confirmed that the world is losing clouds which reflect sunlight back into space. The analysis shows that cloud regions have contracted especially around storm zones. This is bad news, as it makes it yet again likelier that we are underestimating the pace of warming. Paper here, press release here.
Partnered with Nautilus
Nautilus Is All Brains, No Bull
Like you, Nautilus readers appreciate a no-jargon, no-nonsense approach to science news. Nautilus has the very brightest living thinkers - including Sabine herself - unravel the biggest ideas in science and weave them into stories that are easy to understand and fun to read. Subscribe to the free Nautilus newsletter today and join over 700,000 more people who love to learn.
Reasoning Models Take Up a Lot of Energy

Figure: Dauner & Socher, Front. Commun. 10 (2025)
In a finding that surprises absolutely no one, researchers from Germany confirmed that Large Language Models consume considerably more energy, and produce considerably more carbon emissions, if they use extra reasoning steps. The most carbon-intensive of the models they tested (which does not include either GPT, Gemini, or Claude) is DeepSeek, which on their questions, however, also reached the highest accuracy. The researchers want you to carefully consider whether demanding more accuracy from an AI is really worth the extra carbon footprint, but I don’t have the energy to think about it… Paper here, press release here.
Start learning AI in 2025
Keeping up with AI is hard – we get it!
That’s why over 1M professionals read Superhuman AI to stay ahead.
Get daily AI news, tools, and tutorials
Learn new AI skills you can use at work in 3 mins a day
Become 10X more productive